Connect with us

Startup

Disability rights activist Pavan Muntha bats for an inclusive rural society centred around natural farming

Published

on


Born into an upper middle-class family, Pavan Kumar Muntha faced an internal battle accepting his visual disability. 

“I was always trying to prove myself, competing with others, and yet grappling with the stigma attached to being disabled,” recalls Muntha, who lives in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh. 

This perspective shifted when he participated in a groundbreaking World Bank-funded study on the lives of disabled people in rural Andhra Pradesh.

During the course of this study, an incident in Warangal (now part of Telangana) changed his outlook forever. While meeting a young woman with a severe disability, Muntha was struck by the systemic neglect she had endured all her life. 

Muntha says, “She was so malnourished that she crawled around the house and looked like she was 14 years old, when in fact her grandmother revealed to us later that she was 24. Burdened as the sole caregiver for this young woman, her grandmother told us why she delayed eating or ate less. 

“She said, ‘If she eats and drinks, she’ll need to use the toilet, and I must carry her there. Without a ramp or water nearby, this becomes impossible.’” 

This experience catalysed his resolve to address disability not merely as an individual struggle but also as a systemic failure rooted in socioeconomic inequities. Muntha began to understand disability from the point of view of structural barriers, and not just as an individual impairment. 

This experience marked the beginning of his journey into advocacy, integrating personal insight with a systemic critique that addressed barriers holistically, encompassing education, employment, and infrastructure for people with disabilities in rural areas.

Fighting resistance and building alliances

As Muntha began advocating for disability inclusion, resistance from society was inevitable. In rural Andhra Pradesh, he encountered communities that were hesitant to embrace disabled individuals as equal participants in society. 

“We had to strategically address this resistance by building alliances with policy makers, community and civil society organisations, families of persons with disabilities, and disability organisations.”  

Muntha reached a milestone in his journey when he persuaded the Andhra Pradesh government to integrate disabled individuals into the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) programme. Through persistent dialogue and innovative recommendations, he convinced authorities to hire programme officers dedicated to assigning suitable work to disabled individuals. 

“We created disability self-help groups and demonstrated that marginalised individuals could work effectively in agriculture and infrastructure projects,” Muntha shares. 

Between 2007 and 2009, this initiative employed over 2.5 lakh people with varying disabilities across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, setting a precedent for inclusive employment policies in the country. 

A call for systemic change

Along with disability advocacy, Muntha also worked towards a broader push for social reform.

“We proved that people with disabilities could contribute significantly to infrastructure and agriculture projects,” he says.

Muntha’s interactions with rural grassroots communities brought him face-to-face with the alarming issue of farmer suicides. 

Farmer suicides were not isolated but symptomatic of systemic exploitation. Private moneylenders charged exorbitant interest rates, leaving farmers unable to recover from failed crops. During the 1990s, when discussions around globalisation and privatisation were intensifying, governments started advocating for industrialisation and reduced reliance on agriculture. 

This shift, compounded by the introduction of Bt cotton and genetically modified seeds, impacted small farmers in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, says Muntha.

“Monocropping promoted during the Green Revolution and corporate agriculture exacerbated vulnerabilities, eroding biodiversity and making farmers dependent on costly inputs,” he adds. 

Muntha campaigned for employing people with disabilities in the farming sector as part of rural employment schemes. He also pushed for policies addressing debt and land rights. 

By engaging with policymakers and grassroots organisations, he highlighted the need to rethink agriculture and not look at it as a failing profession but as a cornerstone of rural livelihoods.

The turn to natural farming

The intersection of the issues of disability, poverty, and environmental degradation led Muntha to venture into natural farming

In 2011, he relocated to a Dalit-majority village in Andhra Pradesh, where he began experimenting with sustainable farming practices. 

His goal was not only to address the agricultural crisis—exacerbated by monocropping and heavy use of chemicals—but also to empower marginalised Dalit and tribal communities, including those with disabilities.

Natural farming, as pioneered by agriculturist Subhash Palekar, offered solutions. Muntha adopted techniques such as using cow dung and urine for fertilisation, line sowing, and multi-cropping to promote biodiversity. 

His efforts culminated in a landmark three-day workshop in Visakhapatnam in 2015, which brought together over 8,000 farmers and policymakers. Muntha, with the support of state officials, showcased the potential of natural farming as an alternative to conventional methods.

Muntha has always recognised the interconnectedness of environmental sustainability, disability rights, and rural development. 

“Farming is not just a profession; it’s a culture and a way of life, especially for rural communities,” he explains. 

By including disabled individuals in agricultural practices, Muntha envisions an inclusive future where marginalised groups can achieve economic independence, self-sufficiency, and dignity. 

Muntha redefined agriculture in Andhra Pradesh by roping in farmers with disabilities into the practice of natural farming. He believes that many disabled people in rural areas possess agricultural knowledge inherited from their families, which can be complemented with modern sustainable techniques. 

Recognising the value of indigenous farming practices and the people’s potential, he highlighted their ability to contribute significantly to sustainable agriculture.

The agricultural practices adopted by Muntha are designed to minimise physical strain, thus making the work more accessible to farmers with disabilities. 

By promoting crop architecture and relay sowing, Muntha’s system ensures continuous harvest and income, with minimal disruption to the soil, making it easier for people with disabilities to participate actively in farming. 

Muntha began to engage not only farmers with disabilities but also their families, using their skills and understanding of agriculture. 

He also introduced the multi-cropping model, where five main crops are planted alongside 20 biodiversity crops, ensuring sustainability and biodiversity. 

According to Muntha, this method creates a natural ecosystem with plants that rely on each other for nutrient intake and encourages the use of animals, birds, and insects to maintain soil health and pest control. 

“Additionally, methods like pre-monsoon dry sowing and relay cropping enable continuous farming without soil tilling, thus ensuring year-round productivity,” he says. 

Muntha emphasises on hands-on training, equipping farmers with disabilities with practical skills to manage irrigation, pest control, and crop architecture. 

Integrating with the ecosystem

Involving people with disabilities in farming not only provides them a livelihood but also integrates their skills into the agricultural ecosystem. 

From seed palletisation to creating nutrient-rich soil through natural processes, these farmers are active participants in many areas of sustainable farming, contributing to yields that generate incomes of ₹50,000 to ₹1.5 lakh per month, even in low-rainfall regions like Anantapur.

Additionally, visually impaired individuals are trained in sensory farming techniques, such as recognising soil quality and crop health through touch and smell, enabling them to play active roles in farm maintenance.

Encouraging collective farming among disabled individuals ensures responsibilities are shared and physical strain is reduced. These groups produce organic crops that fetch premium prices in the markets, bypassing exploitative middlemen.

A vision for the future

Today, Muntha works as the senior programme manager at Rythu Sadhikara Samstha, a community-managed natural farming programme run by the Department of Agriculture, Government of Andhra Pradesh. He is also the executive secretary of Swadhikaar Center for Disabilities Information, Research and Resource Development, which focuses on grassroots advocacy and sustainable development. 

By bringing together disability advocacy, rural development, and natural farming, Muntha has created a model of resilience and inclusion. His work underscores the power of systemic change driven by lived experience and grassroots action. 

Muntha’s journey, from documenting the harrowing realities of rural India to transforming agricultural practices, offers a blueprint for a more equitable and sustainable future centred around natural farming.

Muntha sums it up well. 

“Natural farming is more of a practice than theory. So we tell our farmers to practise and learn and learn by practising. This isn’t just about farming; it is a holistic approach that connects them to the market, and gives them knowledge of market forces. 

“We train them to first have enough produce for their own household and then establish their primary market in their villages. The entire system gets stabilised this way.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Startup

More tech in Top 50: Deepak Shenoy sees Zomato’s Sensex entry as start of market makeover

Published

on

By


In a telling shift that captures India’s economic metamorphosis, Zomato—the food delivery platform that has become a fixture of urban Indian life—is poised to replace JSW Steel in the Sensex, with whispers of a Nifty 50 inclusion following close behind.

This changing of the guard signals more than a routine index rebalancing—it heralds a fundamental shift in what constitutes corporate power in modern India, and highlights how digital platforms are displacing the industrial stalwarts that once embodied Indian enterprise.

“I think more tech-enabled [companies] are going to be in the top 50,” observed Deepak Shenoy, Founder and CEO of Capitalmind, in conversation with YourStory’s Founder and CEO Shradha Sharma. Yet unlike Silicon Valley’s architects of innovation, India’s digital revolutionaries are charting a different course.

“Zomato is a tech-enabled business,” Shenoy elaborated. “Its business is food delivery and quick commerce. It is not really a tech company from the face of it because a tech company in general would be producing a product that is primarily technical, like Nvidia or Microsoft. What you sell is not tech, what you use is technology to sell the goods. It is a good thing and more and more such companies will come in.”

This nuance is crucial. Even Reliance, the embodiment of old-economy might, now channels its ambitions through the digital arteries of Jio Platforms. The revolution, it seems, isn’t about creating new technology but about reimagining how India does business.

The public markets are witnessing this shift in real-time. Swiggy leads 2024’s global tech IPO calendar, joining other digital enterprises like Ola Electric and FirstCry in their public market debuts. In the same space, Zepto, another quick-commerce player, recently secured $350 million from domestic investors, led by Motilal Oswal.

“You are competing with companies in the public space that make aluminium and steel, they are very boring,” Shenoy noted. “At least the likes of Zepto, Zomato and Swiggy come up with something more interesting to invest in. You can experience their story in real-time. How do we know who makes the best aluminium? Here you can see improvements tangibly, by providing better packaging material, better service, faster delivery etc.”

Yet beneath this digital transformation lurk questions of sustainability. “I think competition is going to increase dramatically whether it is Reliance, Dmart or Aditya Birla,” Shenoy cautioned. “As an investor, the story still has to evolve. You need to see these companies start giving meaningful profits at some point.”

The narrative grows more complex in quick commerce, where India’s foreign investment regulations—which have already entangled Walmart-owned Flipkart and Amazon in regulatory scrutiny—restrict inventory control. Shenoy points out that Zomato’s foreign ownership structure has, thus far, kept inventory costs conveniently absent from its balance sheet.

“You over-order something and you under-order something else, you will have inventory holding costs. This is not visible on Zomato’s balance sheet because they don’t officially own any of these entities.”

A closer examination reveals that Zomato’s profitability draws heavily from investment income—its substantial cash reserves, exceeding Rs 10,000 crore before its Rs 2,048 crore acquisition of Paytm’s events business Insider, have been deployed in fixed-income instruments. This financial engineering, while legitimate, raises questions about the underlying business model’s strength.

From its Bengaluru headquarters, Capitalmind, managing over Rs 1,300 crore through algorithm-driven strategies under SEBI’s oversight, continues to analyse this shifting landscape. As India’s corporate hierarchy undergoes this historic realignment, the question remains: Will this tech-enabled transformation deliver the sustained value creation that marked its industrial predecessors?





Source link

Continue Reading

Startup

How DOMS reshaped India’s Rs 4000 crore pencil market

Published

on

By


The Indian stationery market is a vibrant landscape, particularly when it comes to the pencil segment, which boasts a notable valuation of ₹4000 crore. For a long time, well-established brands like Nataraj, Camlin and Apsara held the crown. But then came DOMS, a fresh brand with a secret winning strategy.

In today’s article, let’s explore the captivating journey of DOMS and uncover the unique factors that have pushed it to the forefront of the market, setting it apart from the competition.

How DOMS disrupted the stationery market in India

Recent data reveals that DOMS achieved an impressive consolidated revenue of Rs 1,547.27 crore for the 2023-2024 period. But what’s the secret behind this remarkable rise? Let’s dive into the key factors that have made DOMS establish itself as a leading brand.

5 sharp success factors

How DOMS Dominates India's Rs 4000 Crore Pencil Market!

1. Killer product innovation

Founded in 1975, DOMS’ success is rooted in its commitment to quality. Unlike many competitors that used graphite and clay to make their pencils, DOMS incorporated polymer into their lead mixture. This innovation resulted in pencils with stronger and darker ink, leading to satisfied customers.

By understanding the needs of its core audience—students—DOMS effectively captured customer preference. Additionally, the triangular shape of their pencils provides a sturdy grip. Today, DOMS’ pencils and other stationery products are recognised for their superior construction and smooth writing experience.

2. Solid supply chain game

Not many of us may know that most DOMS products are built from scratch. Whether it’s wood, paint, or lead, the company handles in-house production. By doing this, DOMS is cost-effective and saves money, protecting itself from price fluctuations in the commodity market.

3. Smart branding and marketing

When a child brings cool stationery to school, it quickly becomes the talk of the class. This is exactly how DOMS established an endless word-of-mouth marketing chain. With its smooth writing and sleek triangular design, every child wanted to use their pencils.

In addition, all DOMS products possess a distinct appeal. The subtle sweet aroma from their erasers and the colourful packaging of their stationery helped the company build a premium-looking brand that kids find irresistible.

4. Becoming a distribution powerhouse

A key factor contributing to DOMS’s success is its strong distribution network. The brand made its products widely available across the nation, reaching a diverse customer base. Currently, DOMS has over 120 stockists and more than 4,000 distributors.

This extensive reach provides DOMS with a competitive advantage over brands that find it challenging to enter various markets. Moreover, the company has a global presence, serving more than 45 countries.

5. Selling more than just pencils

Although DOMS positioned itself as a premium brand, the company realised that selling only one product would not be sufficient. To address this, they opted to offer packages or kits that included various complementary stationery items at affordable prices. This strategy attracted parents and schools who were seeking durable, high-quality stationery without breaking the bank.

The takeaway

DOMS has made an impressive leap in the ₹4000 crore Indian pencil market, showcasing the impact of innovation in capturing consumer attention. By placing customer needs at the forefront and establishing a robust distribution network, DOMS has successfully shaken up an industry that was long ruled by traditional players. Their journey serves as a masterclass for entrepreneurs and marketers alike, highlighting the significance of clever brand positioning, the ability to adapt, and the crucial role of understanding consumer behaviour. If you’re looking for inspiration on how to carve out a niche in a competitive landscape, DOMS’ success story is a shining example!





Source link

Continue Reading

Startup

Tata DoCoMo: Lessons from the telecom brand’s rise and fall

Published

on

By


In 2009, Tata DoCoMo made a grand entry into India’s telecom landscape with a game-changing idea: 1 paisa per second billing. Suddenly, the power was in the hands of consumers who no longer had to pay for unused seconds of a call. The buzz was electric.

Tata DoCoMo became the talk of the town, winning hearts and market share in an industry ruled by giants like Airtel and Vodafone. Yet, a few years down the line, the once-promising disruptor vanished. So, what went wrong?

In this article, let’s explore the journey of Tata DoCoMo, and why its story remains a cautionary tale for businesses!

5 Reasons why Tata DoCoMo shut down?

Tata DoCoMo

1. A winning strategy that was easy to copy

Tata DoCoMo’s biggest appeal was its 1 paisa per second billing model, which resonated with price-sensitive Indian consumers. Later on, they launched attractive services like the “Diet SMS pack” where users only pay for a text message depending on the number of characters.

This gave the brand an initial boost and attracted millions of subscribers. However, this strategy had a critical flaw: competitors quickly adopted it.

Without a significant differentiator, Tata DoCoMo struggled to maintain its edge. The aggressive pricing triggered a race to the bottom, squeezing margins in an already low-profit industry​.

2. NTT’s exit and legal hurdles

India’s telecom sector was fraught with regulatory challenges during Tata DoCoMo’s tenure. The 2G scandal and policy shifts created uncertainty, impacting investor confidence.

Additionally, when NTT DoCoMo, Tata’s Japanese partner, decided to exit due to poor performance, the company faced legal problems. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) barred Tata from paying NTT DoCoMo a pre-agreed exit amount, leading to a prolonged legal battle.

3. Lack of innovation and financial struggles

The joint venture between Tata and NTT DoCoMo started on a high note, but differences in business strategy soon emerged. NTT wanted to exit after sustained losses, but the dispute over the exit terms escalated into a legal saga.

This strained partnership impacted Tata DoCoMo’s ability to focus on growth and innovation. So, to scale up and stay competitive, the company made big investments, particularly in 3G. It spent over $500 million to start 3G services in 9 states.

While these investments were necessary to expand, they didn’t translate into proportional revenue growth. Moreover, its coverage in lower circles compared to its rivals eventually resulted in huge losses.

4. Service limitations

Despite its clever start, Tata DoCoMo lagged in expanding its network infrastructure. Poor coverage and inconsistent service quality began to frustrate users. In a highly crowded market where customers demanded reliability, this became a major disadvantage.

Meanwhile, bigger players like Airtel and Vodafone strengthened their networks, pulling away Tata DoCoMo’s user base.

5. The Jio wave

The Indian telecom sector witnessed massive coalitions of firms, leaving little room for smaller players. Tata Docomo struggled to keep up as competitors merged and scaled operations. Also, the entry of Reliance Jio in 2016, with its disruptive pricing and free data offers, was the final nail in the head. Jio’s aggressive approach reshaped the industry, forcing Tata DoCoMo to merge with Airtel in 2017.

Lessons from Tata DoCoMo’s Fall

Tata DoCoMo’s journey speaks volumes about how a highly crowded space calls for innovation and rapid growth for survival. While its 1 paisa per second billing model revolutionized the market, its partnership issues, and stiff competition led to its downfall. For businesses aiming to disrupt industries, Tata DoCoMo’s rise and fall is a reminder that innovation must be backed by robust execution, financial health, and adaptability.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.