Connect with us

Science

You can take a selfie with the Earth using this YouTuber’s satellite

Published

on


The stunt escalation on YouTube may have reached new heights with Mark Rober’s offer to snap anyone’s selfie with the planet Earth using a satellite he’s launching into orbit with the help of Google and T-Mobile.

If you tell Rober where you live, he claims that he’ll take the selfie while the satellite is located over your city, and he’ll tell you exactly when the photo is going to be taken, so you can go outside and technically get in the shot twice. The satellite is scheduled to be launched by SpaceX in January 2025 (aboard the Transporter 12 mission), and is set to start taking selfie photos a few months after that.

Yes, it’s a total gimmick, and while Rober and T-Mobile are advertising the opportunity as “free,” I regret to inform you that there are some strings attached. You’ll need to subscribe to CrunchLabs, which offers engineering-build kits for kids, to get the free code for the satellite selfie. (CrunchLab subscriptions run between $25-$80 annually, depending on the selected package.) Existing T-Mobile subscribers can also get a free code via the T-Life app, and Google Pixel customers are being offered codes as well.

Codes can be redeemed starting December 3rd at spaceselfie.com. You’ll be directed to upload your selfie, after which you’ll receive an email allowing you to track when your selfie will be taken.

Image: Mark Rober/T-Mobile

Rober has a whole YouTube video explaining the mechanics of the selfie-taking satellite. There are actually two cameras and two Google Pixel phones mounted on either side of the satellite for redundancy, and the whole thing is powered by an expansive solar array, sending energy to a 120Wh battery pack.

This actually creates a unique problem for the satellite, which needs to be facing at least three different ways for solar energy collection, selfie taking, and the sending and receiving of pictures — with no propellors or thrusters to help change positions. To solve this, Rober’s team installed a flywheel inside the satellite to help it change positions depending on which action it’s performing. Pretty smart.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science

Donald Trump picks billionaire Jared Isaacman to lead NASA

Published

on

By


Isaacman is set to replace former Florida Senator Bill Nelson as NASA Administrator, who President Joe Biden tapped to lead the agency when voted into office. Aside from Polaris Dawn, Isaacman also funded Inspiration 4, a mission that took him and three other non-professional astronauts to space atop SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket in 2021.

“With the support of President Trump, I can promise you this: We will never again lose our ability to journey to the stars and never settle for second place,” Isaacman wrote on X. “Americans will walk on the Moon and Mars and in doing so, we will make life better here on Earth.”

Isaacman joins the other group of unconventional nominees Trump has chosen to head up various government agencies and advisory committees, including the new “Department of Government Efficiency“ led by Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Meta turns to nuclear energy for its AI ambitions

Published

on

By


Meta is turning to nuclear energy to power its AI ambitions with the release a request for proposals to partner with nuclear energy developers.

Meta now joins Amazon, Microsoft, and Google in efforts to get more nuclear reactors up and running

That’s much easier said than done. The first all-new nuclear reactor to be built in the US in decades started running in 2023 — seven years overdue and $17 billion over budget. Developers are now designing next-generation technology called small modular reactors (SMRs) that are supposed to make it easier to build and site a project, ostensibly cutting down costs. Those advanced reactors aren’t expected to become commercially viable until the 2030s.

Meta says it’s interested in both SMRs and larger reactors, and is searching for partners who “who will ultimately permit, design, engineer, finance, construct, and operate these power plants.” Its goal is to add 1-4 gigawatts of new nuclear generation capacity in the US by the early 2030s. For context, 54 nuclear power plants across the nation currently have a combined capacity of roughly 97GW and generate about 19 percent of the US electricity mix.

After decades of aging reactors shutting down, the nuclear landscape is starting to change as companies look for ways to generate electricity without producing the carbon emissions causing climate change. Nuclear power plants have increasingly been seen as a carbon pollution-free source of electricity that can fill in for solar and wind farms when the sun sets and gales weaken.

“We believe nuclear energy will play a pivotal role in the transition to a cleaner, more reliable, and diversified electric grid,” Meta’s announcement says. It’s not alone.

Given the long lead times to construct a new plant — and since advanced technologies will still have to prove that they can work at scale — all these splashy nuclear deals are unlikely to help the US meet its short-term climate goals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Oil giants blocked a treaty to curb plastic pollution, but countries will try again

Published

on

By


International negotiations to create a legally binding treaty to stem the tide of plastic pollution ended in a stalemate on Monday — pushing talks past their initial deadline and into next year.

More than 100 countries have shown support for limits on plastic manufacturing. They’ve faced fierce opposition from other countries that are major fossil fuel producers and who want to focus on managing waste rather than tamping down plastic production.

But there’s no way to get a handle on the plastic pollution building up in our landfills, oceans, and bodies without stopping the problem at its source, according to supporters of a production cap. Setting manufacturing limits would have the added benefit of curbing the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. Health advocates also want stronger rules to prevent the use of hazardous chemicals in plastics.

“We are the canary in the coal mine.”

“We’re in it with heavy hearts. Our communities at home are suffering,” says Jo Banner, who traveled from her home in Louisiana to attend the negotiations that took place in Busan, South Korea, over the past week (and which coincided with the Thanksgiving holiday in the US). “We are the canary in the coal mine.”

Banner and her sister founded The Descendants Project, a nonprofit that advocates for communities along an industrial corridor in Louisiana, where many descendants of enslaved Black people live. What was once known as “Plantation Country” is now often called “Cancer Alley” after roughly 150 oil refineries, plastics plants, and petrochemical facilities have moved into the region. Toxic air pollution has been linked to higher cancer risks in communities with predominantly Black residents and neighborhoods with high poverty rates near industrial facilities in Louisiana.

Plastic is made with petroleum, in addition to more than 16,000 different chemicals. Just 6 percent of those chemicals are subject to international regulation, and 4,200 are hazardous “chemicals of concern,” according to recent research.

Those chemicals worry advocates who live near plastic-producing facilities as well as researchers studying the growing impact of plastic pollution around the world. Plastic production doubled between 2000 and 2019 alone, reaching 460 million metric tons, according to countries that joined a High Ambition Coalition to End Plastic Pollution.

“We’re on the fence line [bordering industrial facilities], but make no mistake, everybody’s on the line,” Banner tells The Verge. “It’s just a matter of time before that fence line is in your backyard. So now is the time to act and intervene.”

Banner has attended each of the five rounds of plastic treaty negotiations involving more than 170 countries that have taken place since 2022. Environmental advocates had hoped for a treaty similar to past international agreements to curb the use of ozone-depleting substances and stop global warming. But what was supposed to be the final round of talks in Busan came to a close at 2:50AM local time on Monday without a deal. Instead, another meeting is supposed to be scheduled sometime in 2025.

“We have been forced to delay addressing one of the most pressing issues of our time to a later date by a few obstructionist countries,” Merrisa Naidoo, a plastic program manager at the nonprofit GAIA Africa, said in a statement shared with reporters by email.

Delegates from Saudi Arabia led a group of petroleum-producing countries that fought any measures that would limit plastic production, The New York Times reported. The US, the world’s biggest oil producer, notably chose not to join other countries in the High Ambition Coalition nor nations that submitted a proposal to set “a global target to reduce the production of primary plastic polymers to sustainable levels.” 

“We are not here to end plastic itself … but plastic pollution,” a delegate from Kuwait said during the closing plenary.

Instead of capping plastic production, they want to improve recycling rates. Current rates are so abysmal that environmental groups often call recycling a “myth.” Less than 10 percent of plastic waste is recycled.

Plastic is difficult and expensive to recycle, in part because there are so many different types and ingredients. Even when it’s rehashed, it gets “downcycled” because it’s hard to maintain the same quality of material with each use. Plastic bottles are used to make fibers for carpeting, for example. And gadgets made using recycled plastic generally have to be reinforced with virgin plastic. In the end, it often winds up being cheaper to make new plastic rather than recycling.

Despite the lack of a final agreement, Banner is still holding out hope that a strong plastics treaty can eventually come together. “It’s still disappointing that we weren’t able to reach the treaty yet,” she says. “But at the same time, I feel more motivated and more just reinvigorated to continue the process and definitely pushing more ambition.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.