Connect with us

Startup

Shining bright: The rise of lab-grown diamonds in India

Published

on


Traditionally, gold has held a special place in Indian culture compared to diamond, and is often seen as a safer investment with strong resale value. However, the diamond market is undergoing a significant transformation, particularly with the rise of lab-grown diamonds, attracting younger, eco-conscious consumers.

Recent moves by major players like Tata Group’s Trent and Senco Gold and Diamond highlight this shift. While Trent’s new subsidiary, Pome, aims to tap into the growing demand for lab-grown diamonds, Senco Gold is expanding its reach by creating a separate subsidiary, SENNES Fashion. Senco is also reportedly in advanced discussions to acquire D2C lab-grown diamond player Melorra in a Rs 50 crore deal. 

These strategic moves reflect a growing recognition of the lab-grown diamond sector in India, which is still establishing itself compared to the American and European markets, where it has a stronger foothold. 

The Indian lab-grown diamond jewellery market is expected to grow from $299.9 million in 2023 to $1,192.3 million by 2033, at a CAGR of 14.8%, according to management consulting firm Technopak. 

How is it made?

Lab-grown diamonds, also known as man-made diamonds, are manufactured by replicating geological processes in a laboratory on a graphite chip or diamond seed. 

They are physically and chemically identical to mined diamonds, making it almost impossible to differentiate between the two without specialised equipment. 

After the diamonds are manufactured, a process that takes between 15 days to a month, it has to be cut and polished by hand, just like mined diamonds, by skilled artisans known as kaarigars

“China used to be a 70%-80% supplier of lab-grown diamonds historically. But from my understanding, almost 30%-40% of global lab-grown diamonds are now coming out of labs out of Gujarat in India,” notes Ankit Agarwal, Managing Partner at Alteria Capital, which counts Giva, Bluestone, Melorra, and recently funded Grown diamond company Aukera in its portfolio. 

While China manufactures diamonds using the High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) technique, Indian labs manufacture these using the Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) technique, which is more economical than HPHT. 

Moreover, Surat’s reputation as a hub for cutting and polishing diamonds and the availability of skilled kaarigars at competitive wages not only attracts businesses but also helps keep manufacturing costs low.

Affordable and democratized

The pricing of mined diamonds is often influenced by syndicates and cartels that maintain high prices by creating artificial scarcity. In contrast, lab-grown diamonds are subject to market forces of supply and demand, resulting in more competitive pricing.

“Because of technological advancements in the growing process of lab-grown diamonds and the global demand and supply scenario in the trade, the prices of lab-grown diamonds have seen a little fall in prices. Moreover, the margins at the manufacturing level have been curtailed a bit because of more competition,” clarifies Nipun Kochar, Founder and CEO at Jewelbox, a Shark Tank India fame lab-grown diamond jewellery maker. 

There is no further scope for prices to correct any further, anything beyond that will be just competitors trying to undercut each other, but that will be short term, clarifies Ishendra Agarwal, Founder, GIVA, a jewellery platform.

As per current prices, a 1-karat lab-grown diamond is priced in the range of Rs 75,000 to Rs 90,000, while mined diamonds with the same colour and clarity would be priced in the range of Rs 6-10 lakh, noted Aukera’s Mukhedkar. 

“Diamonds were earlier sold primarily as an investment. Now, consumers are waking up and instead of looking for resale value, they’re starting to consider the opportunity cost of investment in diamonds (especially grown vs mined), and that is therefore changing the entire narrative. A lot of people are just thinking of buying stunning looking luxury items, without being driven by how much the value will appreciate in future (almost like an iPhone),” says Darayus Mehta, Co-founder of True Diamonds, a D2C player in the lab-grown diamond space. 

Since lab-grown diamonds are almost 10 times cheaper compared to natural diamonds, customers are realising the high opportunity cost associated with mined diamonds. They can buy a lab-grown version and invest the remaining money and get better returns than hoping for appreciation in mined diamonds. 

“In lab-grown, if you’re spending only 1/10th of an amount compared to mined diamond, then you’re actually buying it to just wear it and may not care so much about resale value. Resale value becomes a lot more important for a much higher ticket value purchase. Although, LGD players are also offering buyback options to their consumers,” says Alteria Capital’s Agarwal.

Feel Good Factors: Sustainable and Ethical

In addition to their affordability, lab-grown diamonds also come with additional selling points such as being environmentally friendly and ethically sourced, that is without a blood diamond tag. 

Moreover, since the entire process of making a diamond is controlled to the last Celsius, it allows manufacturers greater control over the cut and colour of the finished product. Lab-grown diamonds come with more variation and sizes, and less wastage when compared to mined diamonds. 

“For lab-grown diamonds, everything is done to a prescription and every part of the manufacturing process is controlled. Therefore, the outcomes and sheer value you get is unimaginable. Add to that, is fair margins unlike mined diamonds,” highlights Lisa Mukhedkar, Co-founder of Aukera, a lab-grown diamond jewellery brand. 

Besides the usual cuts and colours, Aukera offers at least three different types of colour options like aqua blue, champagne, and pink sky for its diamonds along with a plethora of cuts. 

The festive season has been extremely glittery for lab-grown diamond players this year. Jewelbox sees a 300% rise in its festive season sales this year as compared to 2023.

GIVA Founder Agarwal says the company expects to get 20% of its revenues from lab-grown diamonds by the end of this year after piloting them just six months ago. The number is expected to be around 35% to 40% by the end of the next financial year. 

Rocky road ahead

Since mined diamonds are sold at huge markups on retail fronts, it is impossible to create an ecosystem that would allow cross-selling and keeping the same diamond in the loop like gold and other precious metals. 

While some of the prominent lab-grown diamond players like GIVA, Jewelbox, and Limelight offer buyback and exchange policies similar in quantum to those available on mined diamonds, it is unlikely to be a key differentiating factor. 

Pricing for lab-grown diamonds is decided purely by market forces, instead of any regulatory or international body. Brands will increasingly avoid talking about the per carat rate anymore and instead just focus on selling stunning jewellery, resulting in differential pricing across brands. Therefore, it will be tough to create an ecosystem that allows for exchange and buybacks between brands, notes Mehta.  

Players like GIVA are extremely bullish on the sector and plan to use 40 to 50% of the primary amount to hold inventory for lab-grown diamonds. It has raised a total of Rs 525 crore in its Series B round from Premji Invest, Epiq Capital, and Edelweiss Discover Fund, of which Rs 270 crore was from primary transactions.

The sector may seem lucrative for new-age players who don’t have skin in the mined diamond space, but it is much more difficult for legacy brands to carve a share here. 

“It could be tough for larger incumbent brands to do it in a major way because they may severely cannibalise their own product since most of the business revenue, and margins are coming from mined diamonds. However, there will be a market for both and grown diamonds will only expand the overall market with larger reach due to better affordability,” says Alteria Capital’s Agarwal. 

Players focusing specifically on lab-grown diamonds may have a significant advantage in this space in terms of building early trusted brand positioning, believes Alteria Capital’s Agarwal. 

Even among lab-grown diamond players, trust, style, and distribution are key for brands to perform well and pull customers in.

“It requires capital. You’ll require strong capital to market. There is an inventory cost, there is a Capex cost, and it’s a very offline-driven market, which requires stores and heavy capital expenditure. So, whoever gets the initial thrust of capital support will have a significant advantage,” notes Agarwal. 

The Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) has called on the government to implement strict regulations requiring traders to clearly indicate whether a diamond is natural or lab-grown in their marketing in order to eliminate confusion.

While some brands and upcoming players are seeing and marketing lab-grown diamonds as a competitive advantage, the industry is still in a nascent stage for clear terminology and standardised regulation. 

“What makes it a lab-grown diamond is that it is made of 100% carbon and is structurally and optically identical to a natural diamond. So, asking lab-grown diamonds to call themselves synthetic is ridiculous. Why should we call ourselves synthetic” says Mukhedkar of Aukera.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Startup

Swiggy IPO gets oversubscribed led by QIB bids

Published

on

By


Foodtech giant Swiggy IPO was oversubscribed 1.07 times by Friday afternoon, the third day of its book-building process. 

Qualified Institutional buyers (QIBs), which typically invest on the last day to gauge overall market demand, came through for the company’s IPO, with the portion oversubscribed 1.52 times.

According to the BSE, non-institutional investors(NIIS) made bids for 22% of the allocated issue size, while retail investors subscribed to 97% of the portion.

The Sriharsha Majety-led company saw the quota reserved for employees being subscribed 1.38 times.

On the first and second days of the book-building process, Swiggy IPO was subscribed only 35% and 12%, respectively.

Swiggy has secured nearly Rs 5,085 crore (about $605 million) from anchor investors, including the life insurance and mutual fund divisions of HDFC, ICICI, and SBI. The anchor book attracted participation from over 75 major domestic mutual funds, along with international investors such as Astrone Capital, Fidelity, and BlackRock.

The Bengaluru-headquartered company, which competes with publicly listed Zomato and General Catalyst-backed Zepto, has set its IPO price band at Rs 371 – Rs 390 per equity share.





Source link

Continue Reading

Startup

OpenAI spent $10 million on this domain: Here’s why!

Published

on

By


Have you checked out X (formerly Twitter) lately? If you have, you might have come across an intriguing post by Sam Altman featuring a mysterious URL called “Chat.com”, with no caption. Curious? When you click on it, you’re taken straight to OpenAI’s groundbreaking tool, ChatGPT.

OpenAI has made headlines recently with a jaw-dropping move: they reportedly shelled out over $10 million for this domain! At first glance, this looks like a steep price tag in an era where many brands are trimming their budgets to stay lean.

So, what’s the story behind this hefty domain purchase? Let’s take a closer look at this!

Why OpenAI spent millions of dollars on a domain

This strategic move is driven by OpenAI’s mission to establish itself as a dominant force in the realm of AI-powered tools, particularly through its flagship product, ChatGPT.

In the tech world where innovation reigns supreme, securing a domain that perfectly aligns with the branding and functionality of its most popular service is a given. Today, ChatGPT has rapidly become a go-to AI tool used by millions for generating images, answering questions and offering assistance with content creation and even programming.

So, OpenAI’s purchase of chat.com is not just about owning a cool web address—it’s a calculated move to enhance its digital identity and ensure that the ChatGPT experience remains tied to its brand as it expands its offerings.

The bigger picture: OpenAI and HubSpot

In a surprising turn of events, the tech world is buzzing over OpenAI’s recent million-dollar domain acquisition, leaving many to wonder about its intriguing backstory. The domain in question, chat.com, has quite the history—it was initially registered way back in September 1996.

Fast forward to 2023, and it found a new owner in Dharmesh Shah, the co-founder and CTO of the widely popular CRM platform HubSpot, who purchased it for a staggering $15.5 million! But the plot thickens!

Just a few months later, in March, Dharmesh dropped a bombshell: he sold chat.com to an anonymous buyer for an undisclosed sum, which has now been confirmed to be OpenAI. While Sam Altman has remained tight-lipped about the specifics of the acquisition, reports from The Verge suggest that Dharmesh may have pocketed more than $15 million from the sale.

This hefty investment in chat.com is more than just a flashy purchase; it’s part of OpenAI’s strategic vision. Owning a domain that’s not only memorable but also inspires trust is crucial for establishing credibility and attracting customers in this competitive landscape.

Chat.com is now ChatGPT’s new destination

Spending more than $10 million on a domain might seem extravagant, but for OpenAI, this investment is a strategic move aimed at building a more unified, and recognisable brand. With chat.com, the company positions itself at the centre of the rapidly growing AI-powered market. As OpenAI continues to innovate, this domain acquisition will likely prove to be one of the company’s most crucial investments in securing its place at the top of the AI industry.





Source link

Continue Reading

Startup

Trent Q2 profit grows 47% to Rs 335 Cr; sales jumps 39.3%

Published

on

By


Tata Group retail firm Trent on Thursday reported a 46.9% growth in its consolidated net profit to Rs 335.06 crore for the second quarter ended September 2024.

The company had posted a consolidated net profit of Rs 228.06 crore a year ago, according to a regulatory filing from Trent, which operates retail stores under brands like Westside, Zudio, and Star.

Its consolidated revenue from operations increased 39.37% to Rs 4,156.67 crore during the quarter under review. It was Rs 2,982.42 crore in the year-ago period, it added.

Trent’s total expenses rose 48.49% to Rs 3,743.61 crore in the September quarter.

As of September 30, Trent was operating 226 Westside, 577 Zudio and 28 stores across other lifestyle concepts, the company said in an earning statement.

“During the quarter, we opened 7 Westside and 34 Zudio stores (including 1 in Dubai) across 27 cities. We also consolidated 9 Westside and 16 Zudio stores,” it added.

Its Chairman Noel N Tata said: “Consumer sentiment has remained relatively muted. This coupled with seasonality has meant that retail businesses have faced headwinds. In the foregoing context, the team has delivered strong results across brands, concepts, categories and channels in Q2”.

Shares of Trent Ltd on Thursday settled at Rs 6,498.45 on BSE, down 6.54% from the previous close.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.