Connect with us

Science

Tesla’s wants net-zero emissions, but its pollution grew last year

Published

on

[ad_1]

Tesla’s greenhouse gas emissions grew by nearly 10 million metric tons of CO2 last year, according to the company’s latest impact report, which provides the most revealing look yet of how the company is thinking about climate-related risks and its own carbon footprint.

In 2023, Tesla was responsible for more than 50 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions compared to just under 42 million metric tons the year prior, a roughly 20 percent increase in pollution. Most of the additional pollution comes from Tesla’s supply chain. Goods and services it purchased account for nearly 80 percent of the company’s overall carbon footprint.

The report says Tesla is working toward net-zero greenhouse gas emissions “as soon as possible” and outlines steps the company plans to take to get there. It also names some of the biggest risks the company faces as a result of climate change. However, it shows that the company’s supply chain has gotten dirtier over the past year. 

The company’s supply chain has gotten dirtier over the past year

Since dirty supply chains often make up the biggest chunk of a company’s carbon footprint, environmental advocates are pushing regulators to crack down on those emissions. It looks as if Tesla is already taking steps to comply with new rules from the Securities and Exchange Commission that require a lot more transparency around climate change. 

The SEC’s initial proposal in 2022 would have required large companies to disclose so-called indirect emissions from their supply chains and the use of their products. But that faced immediate backlash from companies saying those were the most difficult emissions to control. The measure was ultimately dropped from climate rules the SEC finalized in March

Under those rules, which already face challenges in court, big companies will still have to divulge data on carbon pollution from their direct operations and energy use that are “material,” or essential to investors’ understanding of a company’s financial situation. They’ll also have to assess and share risks and impacts they face as a result of climate change. 

Tesla conducted a sustainability assessment in 2023 “to determine areas material to the business and salient to society and the environment,” the report says. That resulted in a list of 20 “focus areas,” including climate risk management, air quality, water use, “responsible” AI, the health and safety of its workers, and more.

Drought poses the biggest risk to Tesla’s business in the short term

There’s even an entire section in the report dedicated to climate risk. Drought poses the biggest risk to Tesla’s manufacturing in the short term, it says, while heat becomes a bigger problem in the long term. After all, Tesla operates several facilities in California, Nevada, and Texas — all parched Western states grappling with rising temperatures and increasingly stressed water systems. The company says it assesses climate risks at each of its manufacturing facilities, including flooding, heavy rainfall, strong winds, extreme heat, wildfire, and drought. Those assessments will inform any plans to expand sites or design new facilities, it says.

Tesla also acknowledges in the report that it might have to change the way it does business to bring its carbon emissions down. “As regulations around GHG emissions management evolve, we may need to make further capital investments that are different from or accelerated relative to existing plans, which may impact profitability. Policy changes may impact certain practices or infrastructure, potentially reducing installed capacity because the technology used-such as with die casting or the paint shop-cannot be fully decarbonized,” the report says.

The company, of course, faces a slew of problems beyond climate change. Its sales, stock price, and staff have all dropped in numbers this year. So it won’t be easy for the company to blame lower profits on efforts to comply with climate policy.

While its carbon footprint has grown over the past year, Tesla says that doesn’t account for the pollution avoided when consumers switch from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles. Its customers avoided 20 million metric tons of CO2 pollution in 2023, Tesla estimates. And compared to automakers making gas-guzzling cars, Tesla’s carbon footprint is still much smaller. Ford’s carbon footprint, for comparison, is more than seven times larger at 386 million metric tons of CO2 in 2023.

Tesla claims that typical greenhouse gas accounting methods “weren’t built for a company like Tesla” that makes products including EVs, solar panels, and batteries that displace fossil fuels. Numbers for its greenhouse gas emissions are buried in the report’s appendix without adding up the line items to show a total for its carbon footprint. Up top, the company focuses on comparing the lifetime emissions of its EVs to internal combustion engine vehicles.

When it comes down to it, you can’t manage what you can’t measure. The data Tesla has started to share about its operations will be crucial for holding it accountable to its vision of reaching net-zero emissions. There’s still more vital information the company has to share if it’s taking climate change seriously: a concrete timeline for its efforts to slash pollution.

This seems to be the first time that Tesla has said in a report that it “strives to achieve net-zero GHG emissions across our full product lifecycle, from mining and production through use and end of life recycling.” The report also says the company plans to match 100 percent electricity use for its operations with renewable energy. (It already does this for its Supercharger network.) But the company hasn’t set a deadline for those targets and didn’t immediately respond to questions from The Verge.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science

Starlink Mini brings space internet to backpackers

Published

on

By

[ad_1]

SpaceX’s Starlink internet-from-space service is already available for boatsplanes, vanlifersAmazonian villages, and rural homes in over 75 countries — now it’s coming to backpackers.

The new compact DC-powered Starlink Mini is about the size of a thick laptop and integrates the Wi-Fi router right inside the dish. And despite using less power than other Starlink terminals, it can still deliver speeds over 100Mbps.

“This product will change the world,” claimed SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on X, saying it took less than five minutes to setup.

Notably, the Mini kit consumes an average of just 20-40W compared to the 33-62W we measured just two years ago with a Standard Actuated dish and separate AC-powered Wi-Fi router. That means you can power the Mini dish for two to three hours from something like an Anker Prime 27,650mAh (99.54Wh) power bank, or a little over an hour with smaller 10,000mAh (40Wh) portable batteries you probably already have laying about. It requires a USB-C PD power source with a minimum rating of 100W (20V/5A). 

The Mini dish measures 11.75 x 10.2 x 1.45 inches (298.5 x 259 x 38.5mm) and weighs just 2.43 pounds (1.1kg), or 3.37 pounds (1.53kg) with the 49.2 foot (15m) DC power cable and kickstand. It has an IP67 rating meaning it’s protected from dust and rain, including short periods of water immersion.

In the US, Starlink Mini is an add-on to Residential plans — at least for now. The Mini kit costs $599 which is $100 more than the standard dish, and will cost an extra $30 per month to add the Mini Roam service to existing $120 Residential plans. That gives Starlink Mini users up to 50GB of mobile data each month, with the option to purchase more for $1 per GB, according to early-access invitations sent to some exiting US Starlink customers. 

While Starlink Mini is new to the US, a Starlink support page says it’s already available in Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Panama where it can be purchased with Mini Service or Mobile – Regional Service plans. In those countries, there’s no data or speed caps to use Mini, and in-motion and ocean use is not allowed. SpaceX says it’ll expand to more markets over time.

“Our goal is to reduce the price of Starlink, especially for those around the world where connectivity has been unaffordable or completely unavailable,” reads the Starlink support page. “In regions with high usage, like the US, where Starlink Mini places additional demand on the satellite network, we are offering a limited number of the Starlink Mini Kits to start at a higher price point.”

As a standalone service, Starlink Mini could be transformative for anyone in need of an inexpensive and sharable internet service that efficiently sips DC battery power. This includes families that depend upon a cobbled together solar generator for power, a squad of soldiers trying to fight back an invasion, or just bikepackers and overlanders taking the road less traveled.



[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Elon Musk has another secret child with exec at his brain implant company

Published

on

By

[ad_1]

Elon Musk, who has long touted claims about the world’s supposed depopulation crisis, had another child with an executive at his brain implant company Neuralink, according to a report from Bloomberg. Neuralink director Shivon Zilis reportedly had the child with Musk earlier this year.

As noted by Bloomberg, Musk has repeated that line several times in the past, including during a 2022 interview with Tucker Carlson and again during an interview at the Milken Institute conference in May. He told Carlson “a collapsing birth rate is the biggest danger civilization faces, by far.” In 2021, Musk’s nonprofit organization donated $10 million to the University of Austin to fund the Population Wellbeing Initiative, a research group that studies the human population.

The revelation also follows multiple reports alleging inappropriate conduct from Musk in the workplace and with subordinates. A recent report from The Wall Street Journal said Musk had a sexual relationship with a former SpaceX intern who later became one of the company’s executives. Another employee says she refused Musk’s requests to have children with him several times, according to the Journal.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Youth plaintiffs in Hawaii reach historic climate deal

Published

on

By

[ad_1]

A group of young plaintiffs reached a historic climate settlement with the state of Hawaii and Hawaii Department of Transportation in a deal that will push the state to clean up tailpipe pollution.

The 13 youth plaintiffs filed suit in 2022 when they were all between the ages of 9 and 18. In the suit, Navahine F. v. Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT), they alleged that the state and HDOT had violated their right to “a clean and healthful environment,” which is enshrined in Hawaii’s constitution.

“We got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected.”

The settlement, reached on Thursday, affirms that right and commits the DOT to creating a plan to reach zero greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2045. To hit that goal, the state will have to dedicate at least $40 million to building out its EV charging network by the end of the decade and complete new pedestrian, bicycle, and transit networks over the next five years. The settlement also creates a new unit within HDOT tasked with coordinating CO2 emission reductions and a volunteer youth council to advise HDOT.

“I am so proud of all the hard work to get us to this historic moment. We got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected,” the lead plaintiff, Navahine F., said in an emailed statement.

Back in 2018, Hawaii committed to reaching net-zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2045 — in line with what climate research determined was necessary to meet the Paris climate accord goal of stopping global warming. But the state wasn’t doing enough to reach that goal, the plaintiffs alleged. Transportation makes up the biggest chunk of the state’s greenhouse gas pollution.

“Climate change is indisputable,” Ed Sniffen, HDOT director of transportation, said in a press release. “Burying our heads in the sand and making it the next generation’s problem is not pono.”

Youth in Montana scored another historic legal win last year after the first climate case of its kind to go to trial. A state court found that a Montana policy that barred officials from considering the consequences of climate change when permitting new energy projects violated the rights of the plaintiffs to a “clean and healthful environment.” The lawsuit in Hawaii was expected to be the next landmark youth climate case to go to trial in the US. Several other state and federal youth climate suits are still pending in the US.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.